Placeholder

AN EVALUATION OF THE JUDICIARY AS A MAJOR PLANK OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN NIGERIA: A STUDY OF ENUGU STATE

Topic Description

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page – – – – – – – – – – i
Approval page – – – – – – – – – – ii
Dedication – – – – – – – – – – iii
Acknowledgement – – – – – – – – – iv
Table of Contents – – – – – – – – – v
Acronyms – – – – – – – – – – vi
Abstract – – – – – – – – – – viii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study – – – – – – – – 1
1.2 Study Area – – – – – – – – – 2
1.3 Focus of the Study – – – – – – – – 3
1.4 Statement of the Problem – – – – – – – – 3
1.5 Research Questions – – – – – – – – 5
1.6 Objectives of the Study – – – – – – – – 5
1.7 Significance of the Study – – – – – – – – 6
1.8 Definition of Concepts – – – – – – – – 6
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Review of Empirical Literature – – – – – – – 7
2.2 Review of Theoretical Literature – – – – – – – 9
2.3 Review of Theories – – – – – – – – 22
2.4 Theoretical Framework – – – – – – – – 23
2.5 Research Propositions – – – – – – – – – 24
vi
CHAPTER THREE: DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Preposition I: Factors that are responsible for slow dispensation of justice in Enugu State 25
Proposition II: A judiciary that has financial autonomy is more likely to function better
than a judiciary that lack financial autonomy – – – – – – 31
Propositions III: Judicial Staff who have good conditions of service are most likely to
performs better than those with poor conditions- – – – – – 33
CHAPTER FOUR: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Summary – – – – – – – – – – 36
Conclusion – – – – – – – – – – 37
Recommendations – – – – – – – – – 37
References – –

PROJECT SAMPLE/DEPARTMENTS

REVIEW OUR SERVICES

SEE FAQ